apply answerability-audit repair queue: ACCEPT variants, derivability fixes, rubric rewrites (46 masters)
- MISSING_ALTERNATIVES (63/64 applied): uncontracted/contracted forms, digit variants (05|5), synonyms and full-sentence variants, via ACCEPT lines and inline gap alternatives; skipped 'better/fine' for the Opposites drill (not opposites of "sick"). - NOT_DERIVABLE (16 fixed, 10 false alarms, 1 skipped): item-level fixes (visible word hints, missing premise, speaker clarifications "Joe (to Jim):", emphasis/cue corrections, un-gapped unguessable words, rounded-number accepts); converted the two book-10 paragraph clozes (Mary / The Mall) from CHECK: exact to CHECK: llm with logical-completion rubrics; cross-book recycled vocab (pilot, teller, barber, variety store, ...) left alone. - UNCLEAR_TARGET (10): instruction/intro corrections (Food "Type the word for the food.", Explain-with-Too intro), cue/emphasis fixes. - Rubric rewrites (57): applied audit-suggested grader rubrics (now effective with the pre-item RUBRIC parser fix); moved the two per-item rubrics of book-11 "Write the Main Idea" inside their items. No clip-bearing line changed; all masters validate (0 errors, 0 new warnings) and pass stage-master clip-identity checks. Full decision log: reactor-module-tools module-convert/answerability-audit/APPLIED.md Co-authored-by: Cursor <cursoragent@cursor.com>
This commit is contained in:
@@ -1944,7 +1944,7 @@ INTRO: For each picture, use the cue to ask a present perfect progressive questi
|
||||
INSTRUCTION: Ask and answer a question using the cue and the picture.
|
||||
INPUT: speak
|
||||
CHECK: llm
|
||||
RUBRIC: Treat the model answer as the key. Require a question built from the cued verb and time phrase plus an answer matching the model's facts; the present perfect progressive form is the point — a wrong tense fails. Accept minor wording differences.
|
||||
RUBRIC: Treat the model answer as the key. Require a question built from the cued verb and time phrase plus an answer matching the model's facts; the present perfect progressive form is the point — a wrong tense fails. In the answer, accept either the cued time expression (e.g. "since 6:30") or the equivalent duration; accept minor wording differences.
|
||||
|
||||
EXAMPLE
|
||||
PROMPT: read/since 6:30 {st-page_038_001.jpg}
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user